hckrnws

As foretold six years ago. [1]

[1]: https://breandan.net/2020/06/30/graph-computation#roadmap

This is a fun idea. What surprised me is the inversion where MUL ends up faster than ADD because the neural LUT removes sequential dependency while the adder still needs prefix stages.

Out of curiosity, how much slower is this than an actual CPU?

Based on addition and subtraction, 625000x slower or so than a 2.5ghz cpu

So it could run Doom?

"Multiplication is 12x faster than addition..."

Wow. That's cool but what happens to the regular CPU?

This CPU simulator does not attempt to achieve the maximum speed that could be obtained when simulating a CPU on a GPU.

For that a completely different approach would be needed, e.g. by implementing something akin to qemu, where each CPU instruction would be translated into a graphic shader program. On many older GPUs, it is impossible or difficult to launch a graphic program from inside a graphic program (instead of from the CPU), but where this is possible one could obtain a CPU emulation that would be many orders of magnitude faster than what is demonstrated here.

Instead of going for speed, the project demonstrates a simpler self-contained implementation based on the same kind of neural networks used for ML/AI, which might work even on an NPU, not only on a GPU.

Because it uses inappropriate hardware execution units, the speed is modest and the speed ratios between different kinds of instructions are weird, but nonetheless this is an impressive achievement, i.e. simulating the complete Aarch64 ISA with such means.

> where each CPU instruction would be translated into a graphic shader program

You really think having a shader per CPU-instruction is going to get you closer to the highest possible speed one can achieve?

can i run linux on a nvidia card though?

Linux runs everywhere

Now I've seen it all. Time to die.. (meant humourously)

Well GPU are just special purpous CPU.

Being able to perform precise math in an LLM is important, glad to see this.

Just want to point out this comment is highly ironic.

This is all a computer does :P

We need llms to be able to tap that not add the same functionality a layer above and MUCH less efficiently.

> We need llms to be able to tap that not add the same functionality a layer above and MUCH less efficiently.

Agents, tool-integrated reasoning, even chain of thought (limited, for some math) can address this.

You're both completely missing the point. It's important that an LLM be able to perform exact arithmetic reliably without a tool call. Of course the underlying hardware does so extremely rapidly, that's not the point.

Why?

Ya know just today I was thinking around a way to compile a neural network down to assembly. Matching and replacing neural network structures with their closest machine code equivalent.

This is way cooler though! Instead of efficiently running a neural network on a CPU, I can inefficiently run my CPU on neural network! With the work being done to make more powerful GPUs and ASICs I bet in a few years I'll be able to run a 486 at 100MHz(!!) with power consumption just under a megawatt! The mind boggles at the sort of computations this will unlock!

Few more years and I'll even be able to realise the dream of self-hosting ChatGPT on my own neural network simulated CPU!